|
. |
|
. |
|
A Barnstaple Poisoning
A True Account of a Victorian Tragedy
If asked about the use of opium in
Victorian England, some people will think of Limehouse
opium dens and recall the fictional evil Dr Fu Man Chu.
Others will think of De Quincy's "Confessions of an
English Opium Eater" representing the cultured
opium-user indulging in an arcane, secret habit. But few
will have heard of 'Godfrey's Cordial' and other such
widely available narcotic potions.
In 1850, my
great-grandmother Ellen Cawsey gave evidence at an
inquest which was reported in the North Devon Journal on
7th November 1850. This related to the death of a
Barnstaple baby, Charles Edward Brent, killed by an
overdose of narcotic poison. The mother Caroline Brent
had given her fractious child a dose of "Godfrey's
Cordial" and because the child remained extremely cross,
she was on her way to buy a further pennyworth of
Godfrey's Cordial from Mr Tatham's shop when she met
Ellen Cawsey who mentioned that "Mr. Weeks's stuff was
much better than Mr. Tatham's - that it was more
composing, and quieted the child directly".
Ellen herself gave
evidence, saying "I have a child which is six months
old, and I occasionally give it, when very cross, a dose
of Godfrey's Cordial. In consequence of Mr. Weeks's
mixture.being better than Godfrey's Cordial I have later
had his. When I give my child a dose, it will sleep
soundly for three hours, say from ten in the morning to
one. The child is not dull or stupid afterwards that I
can see".
Opium (in some form) was
the active ingredient of Godfrey's Cordial, of "Mr
Weeks's mixture", and of many other uncontrolled
remedies. Godfrey's Cordial was originally devised by
Thomas Godfrey in the early 18th Century. Though a
bottle did not contain very much opium, the opium tended
to settle to the bottom of the bottle and hence
overdosing was common.
'Weeks', whose mixture
apparently killed the child, was John Weeks, Grocer and
Tea Merchant of Joy Street Barnstaple. Tatham, who sold
the Godfrey's cordial, was John Walkinghame Tatham,
Chemist and Druggist also of Joy Street. And another
interested party was William Avery. He was not only the
proprietor of the North Devon Journal, but he also sold
patent medicines including Godfrey's Cordial and other
opiates. He advertised these in the Journal.
Now John Tatham (left) was
the Foreman of the Inquest Jury - even though he was
obviously an interested party. Perhaps he selected
himself? He was a power in the town, and was just about
to be elected by the Town Council as Mayor of Barnstaple
and Chief Magistrate. (See footnote)
The Inquest Jury led by
Tatham delivered a verdict which attached great blame
'to the party selling such description of medicine' (Mr
Weeks), as well as attaching great blame to the mother.
The North Devon Journal report also led the reader to
believe that the 'Week's' mixture contained 4 drops of
tincture of opium per dose - a very high figure. John
Weeks took issue with this, and wrote a letter published
a week later, insisting that his mixture contained about
1 drop of opium per dose - "two thirds of the strength
allowed by the College".
Cases like this were
widespread - in real life and in contemporary fiction.
Flora Rivers' baby in the Charlotte Yonge novel, Daisy
Chain (1856), was killed by an overdose of Godfrey's
Cordial given for fretfulness by an ignorant nurse.
The North Devon Journal
report itself commented on "the dreadful and dangerous
practice, so prevalent among the working classes, of
mothers accustoming their offspring to noxious doses,
for the purpose of quieting them to rest, and thereby
permitting their parents to be free for other
engagements, practice, we are afraid, exceedingly
common, and which, if not often productive of
immediately fatal consequences, as in the present
instance, must in numerous cases lay the foundation of
delicacy in future life, and probably induce premature
decline and decay.
But it was not until the
1868 Pharmacy Act that the supply of Opium and other
such substances began to be regulated.
Returning to my Great-grandmother, Ellen
Cawsey, we do not know whether she continued buying
Godfrey's Cordial or other such opiates. We do know that
Elizabeth, the baby she referred to in this case died at
the age of two. But Ellen then went on to have 16 more
children, of whom about 10 lived to be healthy adults.
My grandfather, Thomas, is the small child at Ellen's
knee in this picture of the family.
Footnote
In the years from 1850
to 1852, the Barnstaple Town Council was riven by bitter
dispute, and William Avery (printer) and John Tatham
were at the heart of it, as was a second William Avery
(woollen merchant, Alderman, and a previous Mayor). This
started with the 1850 contested election of John Tatham
as Mayor. His suitability was not universally agreed.
His friends referred to his honour, strict integrity and
liberal hospitality, and declared that the sword of
justice could safely be placed in his hands. His
opponents suggested that a great number of Barnstaple's
inhabitants were strongly opposed to Mr Tatham. (For
reasons which included the fact that he wore a cap!)
In 1851, William Avery,
the printer and Journal proprietor, was elected to the
Council by a tiny majority over Thomas King, and then
chosen as Mayor to succeed Tatham. Ballot-rigging in the
Council election was alleged, and this led to cases in
the Devon Assizes, in which both the William Averys were
accused. Though it seemed to be a fact that ballot
papers had been stolen, the two Averys, and other
accused parties were found not guilty. William Avery
(printer) remained Mayor, and was also Mayor in several
later years. But the case also led to bitter exchanges
of correspondence between William Avery and Thomas King,
published in the Journal in 1852.
David Cawsey
|